The bigger issue is that it seems like this pledge may be targeted at exactly the wrong group on both sides of the pledge. First off, the companies signing it tend to be startups who aren't asserting any patents against anyone anyway. Second, when startups of less than 25 people are getting sued for infringement, it's pretty frequently by small trolls, who have no business but suing (or threatening to sue), and who would never sign such a pledge. I don't think we're going to see Lodsys or Kootol sign up for something like this ever, and no amount of shame is going to make them care about it.
Right now the big problem with patents tends to be more focused on the trolls who are suing and the bigger, older tech companies who are moving away from innovation and into a "protecting" mode with a big pile of patents.
Still, I do like the general idea of figuring out ways to put more societal pressure on companies not to sue innovative companies over patents, but I'm not entirely sure if this idea, as set forth, is the best way to do it. In fact, the other issue with this is that I could even see scenarios under which this makes things worse -- in that a patent holder who signed such a pledge could just wait until a company has more employees... and then can claim it can demand a much bigger award for infringement, since the company has been benefiting from the fruits of infringement for longer.
However, I'm curious if anyone has idea on how to improve on such a pledge, to see how it might be made more effective.
Permalink | Comments | Email This Story
Presented By:
 | Improving products to stay ahead of competition is the norm. Developing a product that changes the game for your industry is rare. How did leveraging a cloud infrastructure enable Thomson Reuters to alter the legal research process so that customers report getting teary eyed? Read their story at | |
| NetApp.com/BuiltOn |
Source: http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110901/09501415765/patent-pledge-good-idea-wrong-target.shtml
No comments:
Post a Comment